SWL literature
Slider

Muratori R et al, 2017: Ductal stones recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for difficult common bile duct stones: Predictive factors.

Muratori R, Mandolesi D, Pierantoni C, Festi D, Colecchia A, Mazzella G, Bazzoli F, Azzaroli F.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Italy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) can be considered in difficult common bile duct stones (DCBDS), with a success rate greater than 90% but data on stone recurrence after ESWL are limited. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate long-term outcomes in patients who underwent ESWL for DCBDS.
METHODS: From May 1992 to October 2012, patients who underwent ESWL treatment for DCBDS, not amenable to endoscopic extraction, were included. Data on long-term outcome were collected through phone interviews and medical records.
RESULTS: A total of 201 patients with a successful clearance of DCBDS after ESWL were included. During a median follow-up period of 4.64 years, 40 patients (20%) developed a recurrence of bile duct stones. Logistic regression analysis showed that the common bile duct diameter, gallstones presence and the maximum stone size were significantly associated with recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed a recurrence rate of 20% over a median follow-up of 4 years. Gallbladder stones, stone size and a dilated common bile duct diameter are risk factors for recurrent stone formation, while ursodeoxycholic acid treatment did not influence recurrence in our population.

Dig Liver Dis. 2017 May 23. pii: S1590-8658(17)30887-3. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.05.010. [Epub ahead of print]

 

0
 

Commenti 1

Hans-Göran Tiselius il Mercoledì, 14 Febbraio 2018 09:34

Although the recurrence risk of bile duct stones is not a urological problem, SWL for difficult common bile duct stones are commonly carried out by or under the responsibility of urologists.
Based on experience of almost 300 (!) patients treated with SWL because of endoscopic failure, the authors recorded a recurrence rate of 20% in patients with successfully cleared ducts, during an average follow-up period of 4.64 years. Obviously endoscopy was not applied after the SWL procedures for which the median number of sessions was 3 (1-8). It is of note that ursodeoxycholic acid had no effect on the rate of stone recurrences.

Although the recurrence risk of bile duct stones is not a urological problem, SWL for difficult common bile duct stones are commonly carried out by or under the responsibility of urologists. Based on experience of almost 300 (!) patients treated with SWL because of endoscopic failure, the authors recorded a recurrence rate of 20% in patients with successfully cleared ducts, during an average follow-up period of 4.64 years. Obviously endoscopy was not applied after the SWL procedures for which the median number of sessions was 3 (1-8). It is of note that ursodeoxycholic acid had no effect on the rate of stone recurrences.
Ospite
Lunedì, 17 Giugno 2019
STORZ MEDICAL AG
Lohstampfestrasse 8
8274 Tägerwilen
Switzerland
Tel.: +41 (0)71 677 45 45
Fax: +41 (0)71 677 45 05

www.storzmedical.com